Here we go again…today I received email from an animal welfare colleague asking that I sign a petition against a proposed ban on all dogs considered to be from the bully breed category; Ohio HB 568.  You can go there now if you like, even before you read any more.  Ohio HB 568

How does one legislate compassion, love, morality, or decency?  Good question, because this breed is continually persecuted because they are strong, tenacious, and loyal to their owners…they used to be called the babysitter dog.  Some have been trained by unscrupulous holders who consider watching animals fight until one is critically injured or dies, a sport.  It is barbaric!

Ohio HB 568 proposes that:

  • No person shall own, keep, or harbor a dog that belongs to a breed that is commonly known as a Pit Bull dog.
  • No later than 90 after the effective date of this bill, a person who owns, keeps, or harbors a Pit Bull dog will be forced to surrender the dog to a dog warden.
  • Within 10 days of surrender, the dog will be euthanized.
  • If an officer has probable cause to believe that a dog is a Pit Bull, the officer may apply for a search warrant.  After obtaining a search warrant, an officer shall seize the dog and transfer the dog to a dog warden, who shall euthanize the dog within 10 days.
You want to kill ME?

You want to kill ME?

This reminds me of the gathering up of all Japanese Americans right after Pearl Harbor and interring them in camps around the country.  Talk about profiling!!  At least most of the Japanese were eventually released.  Arrested Pit Bulls will not enjoy the same luxury.  And no one forgets the concentration camps run by Hitler.  Is this as far as we’ve come?

According to the American Kennel Club (AKC) Massachusetts is discussing something similar with HB 5092.    You can read about that bill at Massachusettes HB 5092

Do people in general, and specifically the people who govern, really believe that instituting this type of legislation will really deter this type of behavior?  Viscous and violent people remain so, no matter how many laws are passed.

Everyone appears to be aghast at the genocide taking place in Darfur; I certainly am, but how is this any different?  Yes, there are many of you out there who don’t consider animals to be equal with man, but both humans and animals are living beings and we both suffer in the same ways.  We also respond to love and compassion, food and shelter.  We usually will do anything our “parents” ask of us too.

Banning an entire breed of dog is genocide.  Are we not more civilized than this in America?  And if we’re not then what is the future of the human race?

This is my mantra!  I am choosing to be FOR what I want rather than waste my thoughts and words being against anything.  I especially choose not to give any power to McCain and Palin.

BUT…before I completely settle into this new-found and peaceful philosophy, I HAVE to comment about Governor Palin’s reference to Pit Bull’s.  I do, afterall, write primarily about animals…and I own a Pit Bull.

Rosie

Rosie

Sarah Palin:

Question:  “What’s the difference between a hockey Mom and a Pit Bull?”

Answer:  “Lipstick!”

A clever quip, I’ll give her that, but everyone needs to STOP using the term “Pit Bull” synonymously with tenacity, attacks, and violence.

I blogged about dog attack statistics last month and you all learned that every dog has a bite history, with the exception of Beagles and Basset Hounds.   Palin could have easily said lipstick was the difference between a soccer Mom and a Bisenji, right?  Still, the negative reference to dogs in any way is offensive to me.  As Obama said in his speech last Thursday, “ENOUGH!”

Pit Bulls have such a consistent and sweet demeanor that they’ve been referred to as the baby-sitter dogs.  They’re only viscous fighters if taught to do so by unscrupulous owners.  Case in point:  Leo, a Pit Bull rescued from the Michael Vick hell hole, and rehabilitated into a therapy dog.   To learn more about Leo go to:

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2008/06/_mountain_view_calif.html

Before I leave you I want to quote a comment from reader Phillip Steir, made to Timothy Egan’s New York Times column, Outposts:

“The fact that Sarah Palin calls herself pro-life, yet has that same blood lust for killing, now in the 21st Century, says more about her than anything else so far expressed by the media.  Killing animals for the sheet pleasure it brings her…says a lot about her values and her ethics.  Do we really want her 15th Century values in the White House now, after we just (barely) lived through what Bush accomplished with a 19th Century cowboy value system?”

What are you FOR?

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.